Romans Chapter 1

The Gospel of God's Power for Salvation

The Epistle to the Romans begins with Paul's introduction of himself as an apostle set apart for the gospel of God. In this first chapter, Paul establishes key themes of the letter, including the gospel's power for salvation, righteousness by faith, and God's wrath against unrighteousness. The Greek text below is from the critical editions of the New Testament. Hover over each Greek word to see its translation and transliteration.

0:00 / 0:00
Playback Speed:
Verse 1
Παῦλος δοῦλος Χριστοῦ Ἰησοῦ, κλητὸς ἀπόστολος, ἀφωρισμένος εἰς εὐαγγέλιον θεοῦ,
Paul, a servant of Christ Jesus, called to be an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God,
Linguistic Analysis:

Paul begins his letter with a formal introduction identifying himself with three descriptors. The term δοῦλος (doulos) means "slave" or "servant" and communicates Paul's complete devotion to Christ. The word κλητὸς (klētos, "called") emphasizes that his apostleship came by divine appointment, not self-designation. ἀφωρισμένος (aphōrismenos) is a perfect passive participle meaning "having been set apart," suggesting God's action in separating Paul for a specific purpose. The word εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion, "gospel") literally means "good news" and becomes a central theme throughout the letter.

Verse 2
προεπηγγείλατο διὰ τῶν προφητῶν αὐτοῦ ἐν γραφαῖς ἁγίαις
which he promised beforehand through his prophets in the holy Scriptures,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse establishes the continuity between the Old Testament and the gospel. The relative pronoun (ho, "which") connects the gospel with God's prior promises. The compound verb προεπηγγείλατο (proepēngeilato, "he promised beforehand") emphasizes the pre-announcement of the gospel in earlier times. The phrase ἐν γραφαῖς ἁγίαις (en graphais hagiais, "in holy Scriptures") refers to the Jewish Scriptures, with γραφαῖς (graphais, "writings") being a technical term for authoritative religious texts.

Verse 3
περὶ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ, τοῦ γενομένου ἐκ σπέρματος Δαυὶδ κατὰ σάρκα,
concerning his Son, who was descended from David according to the flesh
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins Paul's Christological statement, defining the content of the gospel. The phrase τοῦ γενομένου (tou genomenou, "the one having been born") is an aorist participle indicating a historical event. The expression ἐκ σπέρματος Δαυὶδ (ek spermatos Dauid, "from the seed of David") connects Jesus to messianic prophecies, with σπέρματος (spermatos, "seed") being a term commonly used for royal lineage. The phrase κατὰ σάρκα (kata sarka, "according to the flesh") qualifies that this is specifically about Jesus' human nature, contrasting with what follows in verse 4.

Verse 4
τοῦ ὁρισθέντος υἱοῦ θεοῦ ἐν δυνάμει κατὰ πνεῦμα ἁγιωσύνης ἐξ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν, Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ τοῦ κυρίου ἡμῶν,
and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse contrasts with verse 3 by moving from Jesus' human nature to his divine nature. The verb ὁρισθέντος (horisthentos, "having been declared/appointed") is an aorist passive participle indicating God's action in declaring Jesus' divine sonship. The phrase ἐν δυνάμει (en dunamei, "in power") emphasizes the authoritative nature of this declaration. The rare expression πνεῦμα ἁγιωσύνης (pneuma hagiōsunēs, "Spirit of holiness") is a Semitic construction likely referring to the Holy Spirit. The phrase ἐξ ἀναστάσεως νεκρῶν (ex anastaseōs nekrōn, "from resurrection of dead ones") identifies the resurrection as the defining moment demonstrating Jesus' divine sonship.

Verse 5
δι' οὗ ἐλάβομεν χάριν καὶ ἀποστολὴν εἰς ὑπακοὴν πίστεως ἐν πᾶσιν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν ὑπὲρ τοῦ ὀνόματος αὐτοῦ,
through whom we have received grace and apostleship to bring about the obedience of faith for the sake of his name among all the nations,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse explains Paul's apostolic mission. The relative pronoun οὗ (hou, "whom") connects Paul's ministry directly to Christ. The pairing of χάριν καὶ ἀποστολὴν (charin kai apostolēn, "grace and apostleship") may be a hendiadys (expressing a single complex concept through two words) suggesting "grace of apostleship." The phrase ὑπακοὴν πίστεως (hupakoēn pisteōs, "obedience of faith") can be interpreted either as "obedience that comes from faith" or "the obedience which is faith," establishing a key theme of the letter. The term ἔθνεσιν (ethnesin, "nations") typically refers to non-Jewish peoples but here likely includes all nations.

Verse 6
ἐν οἷς ἐστε καὶ ὑμεῖς κλητοὶ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ,
including you who are called to belong to Jesus Christ,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse applies Paul's mission to the Romans specifically. The relative pronoun οἷς (hois, "whom") refers back to "all the nations" in verse 5. The emphatic pronoun ὑμεῖς (humeis, "you") highlights the Romans' inclusion in God's plan. The adjective κλητοὶ (klētoi, "called") echoes Paul's self-description in verse 1, emphasizing that the Romans, like Paul, have been divinely summoned. The genitive construction Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (Iēsou Christou, "of Jesus Christ") likely indicates possession, suggesting that the Romans belong to Christ.

Verse 7
πᾶσιν τοῖς οὖσιν ἐν Ῥώμῃ ἀγαπητοῖς θεοῦ, κλητοῖς ἁγίοις, χάρις ὑμῖν καὶ εἰρήνη ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ.
To all those in Rome who are loved by God and called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse completes Paul's greeting. The participle οὖσιν (ousin, "being") specifies the geographical location of the recipients. The terms ἀγαπητοῖς θεοῦ (agapētois theou, "beloved of God") and κλητοῖς ἁγίοις (klētois hagiois, "called holy ones/saints") describe the Romans' status in God's eyes, with ἁγίοις (hagiois) indicating their set-apart status. The greeting χάρις καὶ εἰρήνη (charis kai eirēnē, "grace and peace") combines Greek (charis) and Hebrew (shalom/eirēnē) greeting conventions, making it suitable for a mixed audience. The source of blessing ἀπὸ θεοῦ πατρὸς ἡμῶν καὶ κυρίου Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ places Jesus on the same level as God, implying Jesus' divinity.

Verse 8
Πρῶτον μὲν εὐχαριστῶ τῷ θεῷ μου διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ περὶ πάντων ὑμῶν, ὅτι ἡ πίστις ὑμῶν καταγγέλλεται ἐν ὅλῳ τῷ κόσμῳ.
First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for all of you, because your faith is proclaimed in all the world.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins the thanksgiving section typical in Paul's letters. The adverb Πρῶτον (Prōton, "First") introduces the first of what might be several points, though Paul doesn't use "second" later. The verb εὐχαριστῶ (eucharistō, "I give thanks") is in the present tense, indicating ongoing gratitude. The phrase διὰ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ (dia Iēsou Christou, "through Jesus Christ") reflects Paul's understanding of Christ as mediator. The conjunction ὅτι (hoti, "because") introduces the reason for thanksgiving. The verb καταγγέλλεται (katangelletai, "is proclaimed") is in the passive voice, suggesting that the Romans' faith was becoming known without their direct effort. The hyperbolic expression ἐν ὅλῳ τῷ κόσμῳ (en holō tō kosmō, "in the whole world") emphasizes the widespread recognition of their faith.

Verse 9
γὰρ μάρτυς μού ἐστιν ὁ θεός, λατρεύω ἐν τῷ πνεύματί μου ἐν τῷ εὐαγγελίῳ τοῦ υἱοῦ αὐτοῦ, ὡς ἀδιαλείπτως μνείαν ὑμῶν ποιοῦμαι
For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I mention you
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins an oath formula to emphasize Paul's sincere concern for the Romans. The conjunction γὰρ (gar, "for") introduces the supporting evidence for his thanksgiving. The term μάρτυς (martus, "witness") invokes God as the one who can verify Paul's claims. The verb λατρεύω (latreuō, "I serve") carries religious connotations, typically describing service to God. The phrase ἐν τῷ πνεύματί μου (en tō pneumati mou, "in my spirit") emphasizes the internal, sincere nature of Paul's service. The adverb ἀδιαλείπτως (adialeiptōs, "unceasingly") is hyperbolic, emphasizing the frequency and consistency of Paul's prayers for the Romans.

Verse 10
πάντοτε ἐπὶ τῶν προσευχῶν μου, δεόμενος εἴ πως ἤδη ποτὲ εὐοδωθήσομαι ἐν τῷ θελήματι τοῦ θεοῦ ἐλθεῖν πρὸς ὑμᾶς.
always in my prayers, asking that somehow by God's will I may now at last succeed in coming to you.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse continues Paul's prayer topic from verse 9. The adverb πάντοτε (pantote, "always") reinforces the idea of constant prayer. The participle δεόμενος (deomenos, "praying/asking") indicates the specific content of his prayers. The combination εἴ πως (ei pōs, "if somehow") introduces an element of contingency, showing Paul's uncertainty about the outcome. The future passive verb εὐοδωθήσομαι (euodōthēsomai, "I will be prospered") literally means "to have a good journey" and suggests divine enablement. The phrase ἐν τῷ θελήματι τοῦ θεοῦ (en tō thelēmati tou theou, "in the will of God") subordinates Paul's desires to God's purposes. The infinitive ἐλθεῖν (elthein, "to come") expresses the purpose of the prospering.

Verse 11
ἐπιποθῶ γὰρ ἰδεῖν ὑμᾶς, ἵνα τι μεταδῶ χάρισμα πνευματικὸν ὑμῖν εἰς τὸ στηριχθῆναι ὑμᾶς,
For I long to see you, that I may impart to you some spiritual gift to strengthen you—
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse explains Paul's purpose for wanting to visit Rome. The verb ἐπιποθῶ (epipothō, "I long") expresses strong desire and emotional attachment. The conjunction ἵνα (hina, "that") introduces a purpose clause. The verb μεταδῶ (metadō, "I may impart/share") is an aorist subjunctive suggesting a decisive action of sharing. The expression χάρισμα πνευματικὸν (charisma pneumatikon, "spiritual gift") likely refers to some spiritual blessing or benefit, not necessarily a specific spiritual gift as discussed in 1 Corinthians 12. The articular infinitive εἰς τὸ στηριχθῆναι (eis to stērichthenai, "for the strengthening") expresses the purpose of the gift-sharing.

Verse 12
τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν συμπαρακληθῆναι ἐν ὑμῖν διὰ τῆς ἐν ἀλλήλοις πίστεως ὑμῶν τε καὶ ἐμοῦ.
that is, that we may be mutually encouraged by each other's faith, both yours and mine.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse clarifies Paul's previous statement, showing his expectation of mutual benefit. The phrase τοῦτο δέ ἐστιν (touto de estin, "that is") introduces an explanatory clarification. The infinitive συμπαρακληθῆναι (sumparaklēthēnai, "to be encouraged together") is a compound verb with the prefix συμ- (sum-, "together") emphasizing mutuality. The complex construction διὰ τῆς ἐν ἀλλήλοις πίστεως (dia tēs en allēlois pisteōs, "through the in-one-another faith") underscores the reciprocal nature of Christian encouragement. The pronoun ἀλλήλοις (allēlois, "one another") reinforces the mutual interaction. The phrase ὑμῶν τε καὶ ἐμοῦ (humōn te kai emou, "both yours and mine") explicitly balances the relationship, avoiding any impression of one-sided benefit.

Verse 13
οὐ θέλω δὲ ὑμᾶς ἀγνοεῖν, ἀδελφοί, ὅτι πολλάκις προεθέμην ἐλθεῖν πρὸς ὑμᾶς, καὶ ἐκωλύθην ἄχρι τοῦ δεῦρο, ἵνα τινὰ καρπὸν σχῶ καὶ ἐν ὑμῖν καθὼς καὶ ἐν τοῖς λοιποῖς ἔθνεσιν.
I do not want you to be unaware, brothers, that I have often intended to come to you (but thus far have been prevented), in order that I may reap some harvest among you as well as among the rest of the Gentiles.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse reveals Paul's past attempts to visit Rome. The expression οὐ θέλω ὑμᾶς ἀγνοεῖν (ou thelō humas agnoein, "I do not want you to be ignorant") is a formula Paul uses to introduce important information. The vocative ἀδελφοί (adelphoi, "brothers") emphasizes familial relationship within the faith community. The adverb πολλάκις (pollakis, "often") stresses the repeated nature of Paul's intentions. The verb προεθέμην (proethemēn, "I planned/purposed") is aorist middle, suggesting personal resolution. The passive ἐκωλύθην (ekōluthēn, "I was hindered") implies external obstacles without specifying their source. The phrase ἵνα τινὰ καρπὸν σχῶ (hina tina karpon schō, "that I might have some fruit") uses agricultural imagery to describe spiritual results. The comparative construction καθὼς καὶ ἐν τοῖς λοιποῖς ἔθνεσιν (kathōs kai en tois loipois ethnesin, "just as also among the rest of the Gentiles") places Rome in the context of Paul's broader Gentile mission.

Verse 14
Ἕλλησίν τε καὶ βαρβάροις, σοφοῖς τε καὶ ἀνοήτοις ὀφειλέτης εἰμί,
I am under obligation both to Greeks and to barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse expresses Paul's sense of universal obligation in his apostolic mission. The dative nouns Ἕλλησίν (Hellēsin, "to Greeks") and βαρβάροις (barbarois, "to barbarians") represent a cultural division of humanity from a Greek perspective. Similarly, σοφοῖς (sophois, "to wise") and ἀνοήτοις (anoētois, "to foolish") represent an intellectual division. The correlative construction τε καὶ... τε καὶ (te kai... te kai, "both... and... both... and") emphasizes the comprehensive scope of Paul's obligation. The predicate nominative ὀφειλέτης (opheiletēs, "debtor") positions Paul as one under obligation, perhaps viewing the gospel as a trust for which he is answerable. The present indicative εἰμί (eimi, "I am") emphasizes the continuing nature of this obligation.

Verse 15
οὕτως τὸ κατ' ἐμὲ πρόθυμον καὶ ὑμῖν τοῖς ἐν Ῥώμῃ εὐαγγελίσασθαι.
So I am eager to preach the gospel to you also who are in Rome.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse concludes Paul's explanation of his desire to visit Rome. The adverb οὕτως (houtōs, "so") connects this statement with his sense of obligation expressed in verse 14. The substantival adjective τὸ κατ' ἐμὲ πρόθυμον (to kat' eme prothumon, "the according-to-me eagerness" or "my eagerness") is an unusual construction emphasizing Paul's personal enthusiasm. The infinitive εὐαγγελίσασθαι (euangelisasthai, "to evangelize/preach the gospel") expresses the content of Paul's eagerness. The phrase ὑμῖν τοῖς ἐν Ῥώμῃ (humin tois en Rhōmē, "to you who are in Rome") specifies the recipients of Paul's intended gospel preaching, tying back to the letter's addressees mentioned in verse 7.

Verse 16
οὐ γὰρ ἐπαισχύνομαι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον, δύναμις γὰρ θεοῦ ἐστιν εἰς σωτηρίαν παντὶ τῷ πιστεύοντι, Ἰουδαίῳ πρῶτόν τε καὶ Ἕλληνι.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse introduces a key theme of Romans with a powerful statement about the gospel. The negative οὐ (ou, "not") with ἐπαισχύνομαι (epaischunomai, "I am ashamed") creates a litotes (understatement through double negative), actually emphasizing Paul's confidence in the gospel. The term δύναμις (dunamis, "power") refers to inherent ability or strength and is the root of our word "dynamite." The preposition εἰς (eis, "to/for") indicates purpose or result. The present participle τῷ πιστεύοντι (tō pisteuonti, "the one believing") suggests ongoing faith rather than a one-time act. The phrase Ἰουδαίῳ πρῶτόν τε καὶ Ἕλληνι (Ioudaiō prōton te kai Hellēni, "to Jew first and also to Greek") establishes a salvation-historical priority while affirming universal accessibility.

Verse 17
δικαιοσύνη γὰρ θεοῦ ἐν αὐτῷ ἀποκαλύπτεται ἐκ πίστεως εἰς πίστιν, καθὼς γέγραπται· ὁ δὲ δίκαιος ἐκ πίστεως ζήσεται.
For in it the righteousness of God is revealed from faith for faith, as it is written, "The righteous shall live by faith."
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse introduces another key theme of the letter: righteousness by faith. The term δικαιοσύνη θεοῦ (dikaiosunē theou, "righteousness of God") could be interpreted as God's own righteous character, a righteous status given by God, or both. The present passive verb ἀποκαλύπτεται (apokaluptetai, "is revealed") indicates an ongoing divine disclosure. The phrase ἐκ πίστεως εἰς πίστιν (ek pisteōs eis pistin, "from faith to faith") is ambiguous but likely emphasizes the faith principle as both the starting point and continuing basis of Christian life. The perfect passive γέγραπται (gegraptai, "it is written") introduces a quotation from Habakkuk 2:4, giving scriptural authority to Paul's teaching. The future verb ζήσεται (zēsetai, "will live") in the quotation refers to both spiritual life now and eschatological life in the future.

Verse 18
Ἀποκαλύπτεται γὰρ ὀργὴ θεοῦ ἀπ' οὐρανοῦ ἐπὶ πᾶσαν ἀσέβειαν καὶ ἀδικίαν ἀνθρώπων τῶν τὴν ἀλήθειαν ἐν ἀδικίᾳ κατεχόντων,
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins Paul's explanation of universal human sinfulness. The verb Ἀποκαλύπτεται (Apokaluptetai, "is revealed") parallels the same verb in verse 17, creating a stark contrast between God's righteousness and wrath. The term ὀργὴ (orgē, "wrath") refers to God's righteous anger against sin, not capricious emotion. The phrase ἀπ' οὐρανοῦ (ap' ouranou, "from heaven") emphasizes the divine origin of this judgment. The paired terms ἀσέβειαν καὶ ἀδικίαν (asebeian kai adikian, "ungodliness and unrighteousness") distinguish between sins against God and sins against others. The participle κατεχόντων (katechontōn, "suppressing") implies an active, willful holding down of truth, not mere ignorance.

Verse 19
διότι τὸ γνωστὸν τοῦ θεοῦ φανερόν ἐστιν ἐν αὐτοῖς, ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν.
For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse explains why humans are accountable for suppressing the truth. The conjunction διότι (dioti, "because") introduces the rationale for human culpability. The substantival adjective τὸ γνωστὸν (to gnōston, "that which is known") refers to knowable aspects of God's nature. The adjective φανερόν (phaneron, "manifest/plain") emphasizes clear visibility. The prepositional phrase ἐν αὐτοῖς (en autois, "among/in them") could mean either that this knowledge is internalized or simply among humans collectively. The aorist active ἐφανέρωσεν (ephanerōsen, "manifested/showed") indicates God's deliberate action in making himself known.

Verse 20
τὰ γὰρ ἀόρατα αὐτοῦ ἀπὸ κτίσεως κόσμου τοῖς ποιήμασιν νοούμενα καθορᾶται, ἥ τε ἀΐδιος αὐτοῦ δύναμις καὶ θειότης, εἰς τὸ εἶναι αὐτοὺς ἀναπολογήτους,
For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse elaborates on how God has revealed himself through creation. The substantival adjective ἀόρατα (aorata, "invisible things") paradoxically refers to attributes that are not directly visible but are perceptible. The temporal marker ἀπὸ κτίσεως κόσμου (apo ktiseōs kosmou, "from creation of world") indicates the starting point of this revelation. The dative phrase τοῖς ποιήμασιν (tois poiēmasin, "by the things made") indicates the means by which invisible attributes are perceived. The present passive participle νοούμενα (nooumena, "being understood") emphasizes intellectual perception. The paired attributes ἀΐδιος δύναμις καὶ θειότης (aidios dunamis kai theiotēs, "eternal power and divine nature") specify what can be known about God through creation. The adjective ἀναπολογήτους (anapologētous, "without excuse") is a legal term denoting absence of a valid defense.

Verse 21
διότι γνόντες τὸν θεὸν οὐχ ὡς θεὸν ἐδόξασαν ηὐχαρίστησαν, ἀλλ' ἐματαιώθησαν ἐν τοῖς διαλογισμοῖς αὐτῶν καὶ ἐσκοτίσθη ἀσύνετος αὐτῶν καρδία.
For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse describes humanity's failure to respond appropriately to natural revelation. The participle γνόντες (gnontes, "having known") is an aorist active form indicating that humans did attain some knowledge of God. The negative statement οὐχ ὡς θεὸν ἐδόξασαν ἢ ηὐχαρίστησαν (ouch hōs theon edoxasan ē ēucharistēsan, "not as God they glorified or gave thanks") describes the improper response to this knowledge. The contrastive conjunction ἀλλ' (all', "but") introduces the consequences of this failure. The passive verb ἐματαιώθησαν (emataiōthēsan, "they became vain/futile") suggests a process of deterioration in human thinking. The passive ἐσκοτίσθη (eskotisthē, "was darkened") uses darkness as a metaphor for intellectual and moral confusion. The adjective ἀσύνετος (asunetos, "foolish/without understanding") describes the heart that fails to grasp moral and spiritual truth.

Verse 22
φάσκοντες εἶναι σοφοὶ ἐμωράνθησαν
Claiming to be wise, they became fools,
Linguistic Analysis:

This brief verse contains a powerful irony. The present participle φάσκοντες (phaskontes, "claiming/asserting") suggests ongoing self-proclamation of wisdom. The infinitive εἶναι σοφοὶ (einai sophoi, "to be wise") represents the content of their claim. The aorist passive ἐμωράνθησαν (emōranthēsan, "they became fools") creates a sharp contrast with their self-assessment. The passive voice may suggest divine judgment, with God allowing their foolishness to be manifested fully. The root word μωρός (mōros, "fool") is the source of our English word "moron" and represents not just intellectual deficiency but moral obtuseness.

Verse 23
καὶ ἤλλαξαν τὴν δόξαν τοῦ ἀφθάρτου θεοῦ ἐν ὁμοιώματι εἰκόνος φθαρτοῦ ἀνθρώπου καὶ πετεινῶν καὶ τετραπόδων καὶ ἑρπετῶν.
and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse describes the ultimate expression of human folly: idolatry. The aorist active ἤλλαξαν (ēllaxan, "they exchanged") suggests a decisive act of substitution. The contrast between ἀφθάρτου (aphthartou, "incorruptible/immortal") and φθαρτοῦ (phthartou, "corruptible/mortal") highlights the absurdity of the exchange. The preposition ἐν (en, "in/for") with the dative introduces what is received in the exchange. The terms ὁμοιώματι εἰκόνος (homoiōmati eikonos, "likeness of an image") create a double distancing from reality, emphasizing the derivative and inadequate nature of idols. The four categories—ἀνθρώπου καὶ πετεινῶν καὶ τετραπόδων καὶ ἑρπετῶν (anthrōpou kai peteinōn kai tetrapodōn kai herpetōn, "man and birds and four-footed animals and reptiles")—represent a comprehensive taxonomy of living creatures, echoing Genesis 1:20-26 and suggesting a complete reversal of the created order.

Verse 24
Διὸ παρέδωκεν αὐτοὺς ὁ θεὸς ἐν ταῖς ἐπιθυμίαις τῶν καρδιῶν αὐτῶν εἰς ἀκαθαρσίαν τοῦ ἀτιμάζεσθαι τὰ σώματα αὐτῶν ἐν αὐτοῖς,
Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins the description of God's judgment on human sin. The inferential conjunction Διὸ (Dio, "Therefore") connects this divine response to the previous human rebellion. The aorist active παρέδωκεν (paredōken, "handed over/gave up") is the first of three such verbs (see vv. 26, 28) marking stages in God's judgment. The prepositional phrase ἐν ταῖς ἐπιθυμίαις (en tais epithumiais, "in the desires") suggests either the sphere of abandonment or the means by which it occurs. The purpose clause εἰς ἀκαθαρσίαν (eis akatharsian, "to impurity") indicates the result of being given over. The genitive infinitive τοῦ ἀτιμάζεσθαι (tou atimazesthai, "to dishonor") introduces a secondary purpose of degradation. The reflexive pronoun ἐν αὐτοῖς (en autois, "among themselves") emphasizes that humans are both agents and victims of their own degradation.

Verse 25
οἵτινες μετήλλαξαν τὴν ἀλήθειαν τοῦ θεοῦ ἐν τῷ ψεύδει, καὶ ἐσεβάσθησαν καὶ ἐλάτρευσαν τῇ κτίσει παρὰ τὸν κτίσαντα, ὅς ἐστιν εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας, ἀμήν.
because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse provides further explanation of humanity's rebellion against God. The relative pronoun οἵτινες (hoitines, "who") introduces a causal clause. The compound verb μετήλλαξαν (metēllaxan, "exchanged") is stronger than the simple form used in verse 23, perhaps suggesting a more complete exchange. The phrase τὴν ἀλήθειαν τοῦ θεοῦ (tēn alētheian tou theou, "the truth of God") contrasts with τῷ ψεύδει (tō pseudei, "the lie"), likely referring to idolatry as the fundamental falsehood. The paired verbs ἐσεβάσθησαν καὶ ἐλάτρευσαν (esebasthēsan kai elatreusan, "worshiped and served") refer to religious reverence and ritual service respectively. The preposition παρὰ (para, "rather than") with the accusative expresses preference of one over another. The doxology ὅς ἐστιν εὐλογητὸς εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας (hos estin eulogētos eis tous aiōnas, "who is blessed forever") serves both to affirm God's character despite human rebellion and to distance Paul from the idolatry he describes.

Verse 26
Διὰ τοῦτο παρέδωκεν αὐτοὺς ὁ θεὸς εἰς πάθη ἀτιμίας, αἵ τε γὰρ θήλειαι αὐτῶν μετήλλαξαν τὴν φυσικὴν χρῆσιν εἰς τὴν παρὰ φύσιν,
For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature;
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins the second stage of divine judgment. The prepositional phrase Διὰ τοῦτο (Dia touto, "Because of this") connects this judgment with the previous idolatry. The verb παρέδωκεν (paredōken, "handed over/gave up") repeats from verse 24, creating a structural pattern. The expression πάθη ἀτιμίας (pathē atimias, "passions of dishonor") is a Semitic genitive construction meaning "dishonorable passions." The explanatory γὰρ (gar, "for") introduces specific examples. The term θήλειαι (thēleiai, "females") is a biological rather than social designation, emphasizing the physical nature of the aberration. The verb μετήλλαξαν (metēllaxan, "exchanged") recalls the exchange in verse 25, suggesting that sexual deviation parallels religious deviation. The contrast between φυσικὴν χρῆσιν (phusikēn chrēsin, "natural use/relations") and παρὰ φύσιν (para phusin, "contrary to nature") reflects Stoic natural law concepts while being grounded in Jewish creation theology.

Verse 27
ὁμοίως τε καὶ οἱ ἄρσενες ἀφέντες τὴν φυσικὴν χρῆσιν τῆς θηλείας ἐξεκαύθησαν ἐν τῇ ὀρέξει αὐτῶν εἰς ἀλλήλους, ἄρσενες ἐν ἄρσεσιν τὴν ἀσχημοσύνην κατεργαζόμενοι καὶ τὴν ἀντιμισθίαν ἣν ἔδει τῆς πλάνης αὐτῶν ἐν ἑαυτοῖς ἀπολαμβάνοντες.
and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse continues the description of sexual deviation. The adverb ὁμοίως (homoiōs, "likewise") establishes parallelism with the previous example. The aorist participle ἀφέντες (aphentes, "having left/abandoned") suggests a deliberate departure from natural sexuality. The aorist passive ἐξεκαύθησαν (exekauthēsan, "were inflamed/burned") describes intense passion using fire imagery. The preposition ἐν (en, "in") with the dative τῇ ὀρέξει (tē orexei, "the desire") indicates the sphere of this inflammation. The present participle κατεργαζόμενοι (katergazomenoi, "working out/performing") implies ongoing activity. The term ἀσχημοσύνην (aschēmosunēn, "shamelessness/indecency") denotes behavior that violates propriety. The noun ἀντιμισθίαν (antimisthian, "recompense/retribution") suggests appropriate consequence, with the relative clause ἣν ἔδει (hēn edei, "which was necessary") emphasizing its inevitability. The present participle ἀπολαμβάνοντες (apolambanontes, "receiving") indicates that the penalty is not merely future but already experienced.

Verse 28
Καὶ καθὼς οὐκ ἐδοκίμασαν τὸν θεὸν ἔχειν ἐν ἐπιγνώσει, παρέδωκεν αὐτοὺς ὁ θεὸς εἰς ἀδόκιμον νοῦν, ποιεῖν τὰ μὴ καθήκοντα,
And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse introduces the third and climactic stage of divine judgment. The conjunction καθὼς (kathōs, "just as") introduces a correspondence between sin and judgment. The verb ἐδοκίμασαν (edokimasan, "they approved/deemed fit") with negative οὐκ (ouk, "not") indicates a deliberate rejection. The infinitive ἔχειν τὸν θεὸν ἐν ἐπιγνώσει (echein ton theon en epignōsei, "to have God in knowledge") refers to retention of God in consciousness. The verb παρέδωκεν (paredōken, "handed over") appears for the third time, completing the pattern. The adjective ἀδόκιμον (adokimon, "worthless/unapproved") creates wordplay with ἐδοκίμασαν (edokimasan, "they approved")—as they did not approve to keep God in knowledge, God gave them to an unapproved mind. The infinitive ποιεῖν (poiein, "to do") indicates the purpose of this mental degradation. The substantival participle τὰ μὴ καθήκοντα (ta mē kathēkonta, "the things not fitting") is a Stoic term for actions contrary to nature and reason.

Verse 29
πεπληρωμένους πάσῃ ἀδικίᾳ πονηρίᾳ πλεονεξίᾳ κακίᾳ, μεστοὺς φθόνου φόνου ἔριδος δόλου κακοηθείας, ψιθυριστάς
They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse begins a vice list, a common rhetorical device in Hellenistic moral discourse. The perfect passive participle πεπληρωμένους (peplērōmenous, "having been filled") suggests complete saturation with evil. The adjective πάσῃ (pasē, "all/every kind of") emphasizes the comprehensive nature of their unrighteousness. The nouns ἀδικίᾳ, πονηρίᾳ, πλεονεξίᾳ, κακίᾳ (adikia, ponēria, pleonexia, kakia, "unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, malice") form an initial group of general vices. The adjective μεστοὺς (mestous, "full of") introduces a second group of more specific vices, some of which exhibit alliteration in Greek: φθόνου, φόνου, ἔριδος (phthonou, phonou, eridos, "envy, murder, strife"). The term ψιθυριστάς (psithuristas, "whisperers") refers to secret slanderers who damage reputations behind people's backs.

Verse 30
καταλάλους θεοστυγεῖς ὑβριστάς ὑπερηφάνους ἀλαζόνας, ἐφευρετὰς κακῶν, γονεῦσιν ἀπειθεῖς,
slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse continues the vice list from verse 29. The term καταλάλους (katalalous, "slanderers") refers to open detractors, contrasting with the secret slanderers in verse 29. The rare adjective θεοστυγεῖς (theostugeis, "God-haters") could be passive ("hated by God") or active ("hating God"), with the latter more likely given the context of human rebellion. The terms ὑβριστάς, ὑπερηφάνους, ἀλαζόνας (hubristas, huperēphanous, alazonas, "insolent, arrogant, boastful") form a triad of related vices involving inflated self-importance. The phrase ἐφευρετὰς κακῶν (epheuretas kakōn, "inventors of evil") suggests creative depravity, developing new forms of wickedness. The expression γονεῦσιν ἀπειθεῖς (goneusin apeitheis, "disobedient to parents") reflects violation of the fifth commandment, a fundamental social duty in ancient cultures.

Verse 31
ἀσυνέτους ἀσυνθέτους ἀστόργους ἀνελεήμονας·
foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse completes the vice list with four terms all beginning with the negative prefix ἀ- (a-, "not/without"), creating a powerful rhetorical effect. The adjective ἀσυνέτους (asunetous, "foolish/without understanding") echoes the "foolish heart" in verse 21, creating thematic unity. The term ἀσυνθέτους (asunthetous, "unfaithful/covenant-breakers") refers to those who do not keep agreements. The adjective ἀστόργους (astorgous, "without natural affection") indicates absence of basic family love and loyalty. The final term ἀνελεήμονας (aneleēmonas, "unmerciful") suggests a complete lack of compassion, the climax of moral degradation.

Verse 32
οἵτινες τὸ δικαίωμα τοῦ θεοῦ ἐπιγνόντες, ὅτι οἱ τὰ τοιαῦτα πράσσοντες ἄξιοι θανάτου εἰσίν, οὐ μόνον αὐτὰ ποιοῦσιν ἀλλὰ καὶ συνευδοκοῦσιν τοῖς πράσσουσιν.
Though they know God's righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.
Linguistic Analysis:

This verse concludes Paul's indictment of Gentile sinfulness with a powerful statement about moral culpability. The relative pronoun οἵτινες (hoitines, "who") introduces a characteristic quality. The aorist participle ἐπιγνόντες (epignontes, "having known") implies clear recognition. The term δικαίωμα (dikaiōma, "righteous decree/requirement") refers to God's moral standard. The substantival participle οἱ πράσσοντες (hoi prassontes, "those practicing") suggests habitual behavior. The construction οὐ μόνον... ἀλλὰ καὶ (ou monon... alla kai, "not only... but also") introduces the climactic point. The verb συνευδοκοῦσιν (suneudokousin, "give approval") combines the prefix συν- (sun-, "with") with εὐδοκοῦσιν (eudokousin, "approve"), suggesting active endorsement. This represents the deepest level of moral corruption: not merely committing sin but approving it in others, effectively establishing an alternative morality in defiance of God's standard.

Romans 1 establishes the foundation for Paul's theological exposition in this letter. This chapter contains the letter opening, Paul's expressions of gratitude and desire to visit Rome, and the beginning of his argument about universal human sinfulness and need for the gospel.

Structural Analysis

Romans 1 can be divided into the following sections:

  1. Epistolary Opening (vv. 1-7) - Paul's greeting identifies himself and his recipients, while also introducing key theological themes that will be developed throughout the letter.
  2. Thanksgiving and Prayer (vv. 8-15) - Paul expresses gratitude for the Romans' faith and his desire to visit them to strengthen their faith and share in mutual encouragement.
  3. Thematic Statement (vv. 16-17) - These pivotal verses announce the letter's theme: the gospel as God's power for salvation through faith, revealing God's righteousness.
  4. Universal Human Sinfulness (vv. 18-32) - Paul begins his argument by demonstrating that Gentiles are accountable to God because they have suppressed the truth about God evident in creation, resulting in idolatry and moral corruption.

Key Theological Themes

Several important theological concepts are introduced in Romans 1:

  • The Gospel - Defined as God's power for salvation (v. 16), the good news concerning God's Son (vv. 1-4), promised in the Scriptures (v. 2), and revealing God's righteousness (v. 17).
  • Faith - Established as the means of receiving salvation (v. 16) and the principle by which the righteous live (v. 17).
  • God's Wrath - Presented as God's righteous response to human sin (v. 18), manifested through "giving over" sinners to the consequences of their choices (vv. 24, 26, 28).
  • Natural Revelation - The concept that God's eternal power and divine nature are clearly perceivable in creation, leaving humans without excuse for failing to honor God (vv. 19-20).
  • Human Depravity - Described as a downward spiral beginning with failure to honor God, leading to idolatry, and resulting in various forms of moral corruption (vv. 21-32).

Literary Devices and Rhetorical Strategy

Paul employs several rhetorical techniques in this opening chapter:

  • Inclusio - The chapter is framed by references to "obedience of faith" among the nations/Gentiles (vv. 5 and implied in vv. 16-17), creating a thematic envelope.
  • Parallelism - The repeated structure of "God gave them over" (vv. 24, 26, 28) emphasizes the progression of divine judgment.
  • Chiasm - The exchange motif ("exchanged the glory of God" in v. 23, "exchanged the truth about God for a lie" in v. 25, "exchanged natural relations" in v. 26) creates a chiastic structure highlighting idolatry as the central problem.
  • Vice List - The catalog of sins in vv. 29-31 follows a Hellenistic rhetorical convention to demonstrate comprehensive moral failure.
  • Diatribe Style - Paul begins to employ the diatribe style (addressing an imaginary opponent) that will become more prominent in later chapters.

Historical and Cultural Context

Understanding the historical setting enriches our interpretation of Romans 1:

  • Roman Imperial Context - Rome was the capital of the empire, with Emperor Claudius having recently expelled Jews (including Jewish Christians) around AD 49, creating tensions in the reestablished mixed church.
  • Greco-Roman Religious Practices - Paul's critique of idolatry and immorality (vv. 22-32) would have been readily apparent in the polytheistic religious environment of Rome, where temples, statues, and various moral practices contradicted Jewish-Christian monotheism and ethics.
  • Jewish Diaspora - The Jewish community in Rome was substantial, and the returned Jewish Christians would have brought distinctive religious and ethical practices that created potential for conflict with Gentile believers.
  • Philosophical Discourse - Paul's discussion of natural revelation and moral decline draws on language and concepts familiar in Hellenistic philosophical discourse, particularly Stoic ideas about natural law.